UPDATE: Protests erupted today at the San Francisco Hall of Justice as community members demanded justice for two families impacted by a tragic hit-and-run incident on New Year’s Eve 2020. Alleged drunk driver Troy McAlister faces serious vehicular manslaughter charges for the deaths of 27-year-old Hanako Abe and 60-year-old Elizabeth Platt.
Protesters, holding signs adorned with images of the victims, gathered early, expressing outrage over McAlister’s potential path to diversion instead of facing the full consequences of his actions. “You had an individual who had committed 91 felonies and they had been let out repeatedly,” said Forrest Liu, a Stop Asian Hate activist, emphasizing the community’s frustration with repeated chances granted to offenders.
McAlister is currently on parole and was allegedly driving a stolen vehicle at the time of the incident. His attorney, Scott Grant, is advocating for a diversion program, arguing that long-term treatment is more effective for public safety than incarceration. “Research continuously shows that long-term structured treatment far improves public safety over simple incarceration,” Grant stated.
However, the San Francisco District Attorney’s Office has indicated that McAlister may not qualify for mental health diversion due to his DUI charge, raising questions about the legal process. Grant plans to contest this ruling, aiming to secure a treatment plan for McAlister that includes regular check-ins and electronic monitoring while he resides in a long-term facility.
The emotional toll of this case is palpable among community members. “To wait five years for a potential diversion request is an assault on criminal justice,” said protester Liz Le. The community’s demands for accountability are echoed in calls for greater transparency within the court system.
Adding to the urgency, today’s court appearance was originally set to address eligibility for a treatment plan, but Grant reported that he had yet to receive the necessary documentation from the Department of Public Health, although it is expected before the end of the day.
The next court date, scheduled for October 28, is critical as it will determine the future of McAlister’s case. Protesters have indicated possible recall efforts against the judge if they feel justice is not served.
As public outrage continues to grow, the implications of this case extend beyond the courtroom, highlighting significant concerns about the handling of repeat offenders in the justice system. Stay tuned for ongoing updates as the situation develops.
