UPDATE: The Broadview Zoning Board of Appeals has unanimously rejected a proposal that would have imposed restrictions on U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) expansion in the village, sparking significant public outcry. During a heated meeting on October 12, 2023, community members voiced concern over the clarity and implications of the ordinance, which some felt could inadvertently facilitate ICE’s presence in Broadview.
The proposal, put forth by Broadview Building Commissioner and Economic Director David Upshaw, aimed to require prisons and detention centers to obtain a special use permit and to remain at least 1,000 feet away from residential areas, schools, daycares, and other sensitive locations. However, it failed to address community fears about ICE’s ongoing operations at the local detention center, which has been a focal point for protests against heightened immigration enforcement.
Residents filled the village hall to express their skepticism and opposition to any formal process that might allow ICE to expand its facilities. “Yes, the ordinance places restrictions,” stated Allisan Galvan, an Addison resident, during public comments. “But nowhere in this document does it prohibit private prisons or detention centers outright.” Galvan emphasized that the proposal essentially provides “permission with conditions” for ICE to continue its activities in Broadview.
Another resident, Janelle Miller, criticized the lack of transparency from the village government regarding the proposal. “I believe this is something that shouldn’t be voted on until we know what this is actually about,” she remarked. “The language isn’t clear… We have to be part of the process, and at this point, I do not feel part of the process.”
Despite the Zoning Board’s unanimous refusal to recommend the ordinance, officials indicated that the Village Board could still choose to overrule this decision with a supermajority vote. The ongoing debate reflects a broader tension in the community over immigration enforcement and the role of ICE in local governance.
This decision comes amidst reports that the Trump administration is exploring potential properties in Chicago to enhance its ICE operations, raising alarm among local residents. The rejected proposal’s stringent requirements, including secure fencing and parking provisions, were seen as insufficient safeguards against the expansion of detention facilities.
With the issue still unresolved, all eyes remain on the Village Board’s next steps, as residents continue to demand clarity and a stronger stance against ICE’s presence in their community. The situation is developing, and further updates are expected as local officials reconvene.
Stay tuned for more urgent updates on this critical community issue.
