Virginia residents are advocating for significant reforms regarding the appointments to the boards of visitors at the state’s public colleges and universities. The proposals aim to redefine how these boards are structured and appointed, with a focus on enhancing diversity of thought and reducing political influence.
Robert N. Holt from Franklin has outlined a series of recommendations. He suggests that every college or university board should consist of nine members, regardless of the institution’s size. These appointments would be for three-year staggered terms, ensuring continuity while also allowing for fresh perspectives. Each year, one board member would be appointed by the governor, another by the House of Delegates—recommended by the delegate from the respective jurisdiction—and one member selected by the current board. Importantly, there would be no restrictions on reappointments, allowing experienced members to continue their service.
Holt believes that these changes would foster a more diverse range of opinions and diminish the political maneuvering currently seen in the appointment process. He also recommends renaming the governing bodies from “board of visitors” to “board of trustees.” This change reflects the significant authority these members hold in the administration of higher education institutions.
In a separate but equally pressing matter, Judy St. George from Chesapeake is advocating for the legalization of Medical Aid in Dying (MAID) in Virginia. Currently under consideration is House Bill 886, which could position Virginia alongside 12 states and Washington, D.C., that have already legalized this option.
St. George, a licensed family nurse practitioner, has spent decades caring for patients in Virginia and emphasizes the importance of giving terminally ill, mentally competent individuals the choice to end their suffering. MAID would allow these individuals to obtain medication to end their lives when their suffering becomes unbearable. According to St. George, this option does not replace existing hospice or palliative care but rather provides individuals with more control over their final days.
She highlights the safeguards in the legislation designed to prevent abuse, asserting that every individual should have the right to choose MAID in accordance with their beliefs and values.
Finally, concerns about the political climate in the United States have been echoed by several residents, including Terry Morton from Virginia Beach. Morton reflects on the potential erosion of democratic principles, citing former President Barack Obama’s assertion that “elections have consequences.”
He warns that failing to respect electoral outcomes can undermine the foundations of a republic. As political factions grow increasingly hostile towards each other, there is a risk that political competition will shift from lawful processes to intimidation and obstruction, threatening the stability of the nation.
Morton encourages healthy protest and debate as vital components of a functioning democracy. He believes that if disagreements arise, peaceful discourse should prevail, allowing citizens to vote or engage in constructive discussions to address their concerns.
As Virginia navigates these critical issues, the proposals for college board reforms, the push for MAID legislation, and the call for political respect highlight the diverse concerns and aspirations of its residents.
