WASHINGTON, DC - AUGUST 11: Federal and local law enforcement officers investigate a suspect’s vehicle on South Capitol Street on August 11, 2025 in Washington, DC. President Donald Trump announced a federal takeover of DC police and mobilization of the National Guard, saying the moves are necessary to restore order in the city. City officials say they did not know about the plans in advance. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
A man employed by the Department of Justice (DOJ) has been charged after allegedly throwing a sandwich at a federal agent on August 13, 2023. The individual, whose identity has not been disclosed, has since been terminated from his position, as confirmed by Attorney General Pam Bondi.
According to Bondi, the incident involved an aggressive act against a law enforcement officer, prompting a serious response from authorities. She stated, “If you touch any law enforcement officer, we will come after you. I just learned that this defendant worked at the Department of Justice—NO LONGER. Not only is he FIRED, he has been charged with a felony.” This statement was made via a post on X.
The incident has drawn attention not only due to its unusual circumstances but also because of the involvement of the National Guard in Washington, D.C. President Donald Trump has deployed the National Guard to assist with law enforcement in the city. This move comes amidst heightened security concerns and aims to bolster the capabilities of the Metropolitan Police Department.
While details surrounding the incident remain limited, the repercussions for the individual are severe. Being charged with a felony could lead to significant legal consequences, illustrating the seriousness with which authorities are treating violence against law enforcement personnel.
The DOJ has not provided further details regarding the circumstances leading up to the incident or the context in which the sandwich was thrown. However, the swift action taken by the DOJ highlights a commitment to maintaining the integrity and safety of law enforcement officers.
This case underscores the ongoing tensions in various metropolitan areas and the increasing scrutiny of interactions between citizens and law enforcement. As the legal proceedings unfold, it will be essential to monitor how such incidents influence public perception and policy regarding law enforcement practices.
