2 August, 2025
exxon-mobil-eyes-permian-expansion-or-deepwater-assets-after-loss

Exxon Mobil’s recent arbitration loss to Chevron concerning the $53 billion acquisition of Hess has prompted the energy giant to reassess its strategic direction. The arbitration panel’s ruling on July 18 denied Exxon a significant stake in Guyana’s lucrative Stabroek Block, a setback that comes despite the company reporting impressive second-quarter earnings of $7.1 billion, or $1.64 per share, exceeding Wall Street estimates of $1.54. This financial resilience, attributed to record production levels, has placed Exxon at a pivotal juncture as it contemplates its next steps in the evolving energy landscape.

Financial Performance Amid Challenges

Exxon’s second-quarter earnings, while robust, reflect the challenges posed by fluctuating oil prices, which have dropped by 10% year-over-year due to increased output from OPEC+. This decline led to a 23% decrease in profits compared to the same period last year, when earnings reached $9.2 billion. Despite this, CEO Darren Woods has indicated a willingness to pursue acquisitions, presenting two primary pathways: expanding operations in the Permian Basin or seeking opportunities in deepwater regions.

The Permian Basin remains an attractive target for Exxon. Following its $59.5 billion acquisition of Pioneer Natural Resources in 2024, the region’s low-cost, high-output shale plays align closely with the company’s strategy to maximize production efficiency. Potential acquisition targets include Occidental Petroleum, which possesses substantial acreage but faces financial challenges that could make it an appealing option for Exxon. Another contender is Diamondback Energy, valued at approximately $42.7 billion, known for its operational efficiency in the Delaware Basin. Securing such assets would enable Exxon to leverage existing infrastructure and further enhance its production capabilities.

Deepwater Opportunities and Strategic Diversification

Alternatively, Exxon could pivot towards acquiring deepwater assets, particularly in regions like the Gulf of America and offshore West Africa. These locations present high-margin, long-life projects that can withstand price volatility. Deepwater operations also align well with Exxon’s expertise in managing complex, capital-intensive ventures, as evidenced by its ongoing projects in Guyana. Prospective acquisitions in this sector could include Kosmos Energy, which has interests in Ghana and Equatorial Guinea, or Murphy Oil, which has valuable assets in the Gulf of America.

Acquiring deepwater assets would diversify Exxon’s geographic footprint and mitigate risks associated with the Permian Basin, such as regulatory pressures or resource depletion. However, the high upfront costs and potential environmental concerns tied to deepwater projects may complicate integration efforts and impact public perception.

Return of Capital to Shareholders as a Viable Strategy

Rather than pursuing acquisitions, Exxon has the option to focus on enhancing shareholder value through its substantial free cash flow (FCF). In the second quarter, the company returned $9.2 billion to shareholders, which included $4 billion in dividends and $5 billion in share buybacks. Exxon is on track to repurchase a total of $20 billion in shares this year. With FCF supported by cost reductions amounting to $1.4 billion in 2025 and $13.5 billion since 2019, the company could consider increasing its dividend, currently yielding around 3.5%, thereby enhancing returns without the associated risks of mergers and acquisitions.

While this approach may avoid the integration challenges and potential overpayments characteristic of M&A activity, it could also limit Exxon’s growth in reserves and production. This situation may result in a loss of market share to competitors like Chevron, particularly in high-growth regions such as Guyana.

As Exxon Mobil navigates its future strategy, the decision between expanding its shale dominance in the Permian Basin or diversifying through deepwater acquisitions will be crucial in shaping its competitive standing in the global energy market. The company’s ability to balance aggressive growth with shareholder returns will ultimately determine its success in this dynamic environment.