Milagro Gramz has been found liable for defaming Megan Thee Stallion following a brief trial. The rapper accused the gossip blogger of orchestrating a smear campaign aimed at discrediting her account of a shooting incident involving Tory Lanez. The jury’s decision, which revealed the emotional turmoil Megan experienced due to Gramz’s actions, has significant implications for both parties.
The case centered on allegations that Milagro Gramz collaborated with Tory Lanez to undermine Megan Thee Stallion’s credibility. Additionally, the trial addressed the promotion of a deep fake video that contributed to Megan’s distress. According to legal reporter Meghann Cuniff, who covered the trial, the jury confirmed that Gramz was liable for defamation and for intentionally inflicting emotional distress on Megan.
Cuniff reported, “A jury has found Milagro LIABLE for defaming Megan Thee Stallion, intentionally inflicting emotional distress by coordinating with Tory Lanez and for promoting the deep fake video.” The jury’s findings were mixed on certain media-related questions but ultimately determined that Gramz could be classified as a media entity.
Despite the jury’s ruling, the defamation claim could still face dismissal if the presiding judge rules against the classification of Gramz as a media entity. Nevertheless, the jury has set damages at $75,000, a figure that reflects the emotional impact of the defamatory actions on Megan Thee Stallion.
The outcome of this case highlights the complex intersection of social media, celebrity culture, and legal accountability. As this story develops, it underscores the ongoing debate over the responsibilities of online content creators and the potential repercussions of misinformation. Legal experts and observers will be closely monitoring how the judge addresses the classification of Milagro Gramz in future proceedings.
