UPDATE: Sen. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., has fired back at a controversial video released by several Democratic lawmakers urging U.S. service members to reject “illegal” orders. The video, posted by Sen. Elissa Slotkin on October 24, 2023, has sparked outrage among Republicans, garnering over 6.8 million views on X.
The clip features military veterans and lawmakers including Sen. Mark Kelly, Rep. Chris Deluzio, Rep. Maggie Goodlander, Rep. Chrissy Houlahan, and Rep. Jason Crow. They assert that current threats to the Constitution stem from within and encourage military personnel to “refuse illegal orders” that violate their oaths.
Blackburn condemned the video as “inconceivable,” stating, “It is disturbing that elected officials would tell uniformed members of the military to defy their orders.” Speaking on The Faulkner Focus, she added, “This reflects a complete disconnect from the values that Americans uphold.”
In a pointed critique, Blackburn accused Democrats of suffering from “stage four Trump Derangement Syndrome,” asserting that their message undermines the rule of law. “Americans want to see respect for the rule of law, not defiance,” she emphasized.
Slotkin defended the video, asserting the need for military members to stand up for constitutional principles. “We want to speak directly to members of the Military and the Intelligence Community. The American people need you to stand up for our laws and our Constitution. Don’t give up the ship,” she stated on X, highlighting the importance of accountability.
The fallout from this video comes amidst broader discussions surrounding the presidential authority to deploy the National Guard. Several lawmakers featured in the clip have introduced legislation to limit this power, a direct response to actions taken during the Trump administration. Their proposals would restrict the President’s ability to act against narco-terrorists without congressional approval.
Secretary of War Pete Hegseth also weighed in on social media, labeling the situation as “Stage 4 TDS,” further intensifying the political discourse surrounding this issue.
As this controversy unfolds, the implications for military personnel and the interpretation of lawful orders are garnering significant attention. The dialogue raises crucial questions about loyalty, legality, and the role of elected officials in guiding and influencing the armed forces.
The urgency of this matter cannot be overstated, given the potential impact on U.S. military integrity and national security. As both sides of the aisle dig in, what will be the next step in this escalating conflict? Stay tuned for further developments.
