A Honolulu-based consulting firm, Wilson Okamoto Corp., has been selected to conduct a comprehensive study aimed at exploring alternative access routes into Puna. The $2.5 million Puna Alternate Route Study, funded by both state and county resources, is set to be completed by December 2026. The initiative seeks to enhance emergency preparedness and alleviate traffic congestion in the region.
The scope of the study includes planning, civil engineering, and transportation engineering services to analyze potential routes along the mauka and makai corridors as alternatives to Highway 130. According to Councilwoman Ashley Kierkiewicz, the study’s objective is to evaluate feasible options that can improve transportation access and emergency evacuation routes.
“The study’s purpose is to evaluate and develop feasible alternative route options to enhance transportation access, reduce congestion and improve emergency evacuation routes,” Kierkiewicz stated. The project will explore three mauka and three makai route alternatives, taking into account land use, natural resource conservation, engineering feasibility, and community priorities. Proposed routes must also avoid properties designated for the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands and comply with regulatory standards.
Community engagement is a key component of the study process. A steering committee composed of county and community leaders will oversee the project, and at least three public informational meetings will be held to gather feedback and provide updates on progress.
Local representative Greggor Ilagan emphasized the necessity of building on previous planning efforts. “I just want to make sure that we don’t duplicate the study that already existed in 2005 with the Puna regional circulation plan,” he noted. Ilagan highlighted the importance of ensuring that the contracted study identifies the best route while recommending a phased construction approach. “They must break it down in phases on what they would recommend on how to construct the road and the reason why,” he said.
Ilagan also pointed to the challenges encountered in securing funding for this study, underscoring the need for accountability. “We work hard to secure this funding, and we want to make sure it’s not just wasteful spending,” he remarked. He further called for state involvement in the planning process, stressing the importance of collaboration. “I would require the state to ensure that they are a part of this steering committee so we are involved and part of the discussion,” he added.
Kierkiewicz reflected on the significance of this project for residents of Puna. “For far too long, Puna residents have relied on a single lifeline in and out of our community — a single corridor that leaves us vulnerable when accidents or disasters strike,” she stated. She also noted the challenges posed by traffic congestion, referring to it as “Carmageddon,” and stressed the urgent need for alternative routes and improved infrastructure.
“Recent natural disasters have shown the urgent need for alternate routes and stronger regional infrastructure,” Kierkiewicz continued. She expressed gratitude for the collaboration between county and state entities on this long-overdue initiative and is optimistic that it will lead to sustainable solutions that enhance safety and quality of life for Puna residents.
