UPDATE: Sean “Diddy” Combs’ legal team is set to appeal after the rap mogul received a shocking 50-month prison sentence, which they argue is unjust and excessively harsh. Combs’ attorneys claim that the judge acted improperly by punishing him for crimes he was acquitted of, following a verdict delivered just days ago.
In exclusive interviews with ABC News, Combs’ lawyers expressed their outrage over the ruling handed down on October 3, 2023, emphasizing that the jury had cleared him of serious charges, including sex trafficking. “Not guilty means not guilty,” stated lead attorney Teny Geragos, highlighting the perceived injustice in the sentencing process.
Combs, who has already served 12 months in prison, was also fined $500,000 for two prostitution-related offenses. His legal team insists that the judge, Arun Subramanian, unfairly considered conduct that the jury explicitly rejected when determining the length of the sentence.
“The Judge acted as a 13th juror,”
said attorney Alexandra Shapiro, who will spearhead the appeal. She criticized the judge for basing the sentence on conduct the jury found him not guilty of, stating, “The sentence was driven by the conduct the jury rejected. The jury acquitted Mr. Combs of any coercion.”
During the sentencing, Judge Subramanian cited the repeated nature of Combs’ offenses and expressed concern over the potential for reoffending. He stated that his sentence aims to send a strong message regarding accountability for domestic violence. However, Shapiro argues that the lengthy sentence contradicts rehabilitation efforts for Combs, who has pledged to lead a new life upon release.
“What is the point of more incarceration for a person like Mr. Combs?” Shapiro questioned, asserting that Combs should have the opportunity for treatment and to give back to society.
Geragos acknowledged the existence of damaging evidence, including a video depicting Combs’ violent behavior, but reiterated that taking responsibility does not equate to the charges for which he was convicted. “We accept the domestic violence. We take ownership of it,” he affirmed, while insisting the sentence was unduly harsh given the jury’s verdict.
As Combs’ team prepares to file the appeal, they aim to challenge the judge’s interpretation of the jury’s decision, arguing that the sentence reflects a broader systemic issue within the judicial process. The case continues to draw public attention, with many eager to see how the appeal unfolds and whether Combs will find relief from this controversial ruling.
WHAT’S NEXT: Watch for updates on the appeal process and any new developments regarding Sean “Diddy” Combs’ case as his legal team moves forward in their fight for justice.
