A proposal for a Buc-ee’s travel center in Palmer Lake, Colorado, has escalated into a contentious issue, prompting a recall election for two town trustees. Initially presented as a standard land annexation for the travel center at the southwest corner of Interstate 25 and County Line Road, the proposal has sparked widespread opposition among residents and local officials. Concerns focus on environmental impacts, traffic congestion, and the town’s water resources.
The upcoming recall election is scheduled for September 9, 2023, targeting trustees Shana Ball and Kevin Dreher, who voted in favor of the annexation’s eligibility during a special meeting in May. This decision, which passed with a 6-1 vote, has intensified divisions within the community. Ball defended her vote, stating it was based on the application meeting state requirements, not an endorsement of Buc-ee’s.
Ball expressed surprise and disappointment over the recall effort, noting, “I’ve learned to have thick skin… I know a lot of people were lied to to get their signatures on there.” The recall ballot will also include a measure requiring public votes on future annexation proposals, reflecting the growing demand for transparency in local governance.
In late July, Palmer Lake officials reached an agreement with Buc-ee’s regarding the financial implications if the travel center is approved. The chain plans to develop nearly 25 acres, featuring a 74,000-square-foot retail store, 120 fuel pumps, and 12 electric vehicle charging stations. A fiscal impact analysis by Economic & Planning Systems Inc. estimates that the center could generate $955,087 in sales tax revenues for the town by 2027.
The proposed Buc-ee’s would significantly impact the town’s water supply. The town currently has a maximum production capacity of 593,200 gallons per day, while Buc-ee’s is projected to use up to 113,600 gallons daily at peak times. The annexation agreement stipulates that Buc-ee’s will cover all costs related to improving water and other necessary infrastructure.
Residents have voiced deep concerns about the implications of such a large-scale development. David Parks, a local resident, remarked, “If I was the mayor in Palmer Lake, I would say this is such a divisive issue… It’s never too late to draw a line in the sand.” His sentiment reflects a broader unease among Palmer Lake citizens regarding the project.
Opposition to the Buc-ee’s proposal has garnered support from notable figures, including Colorado Senator Michael Bennet. Bennet criticized the annexation effort, stating, “This so-called ‘flagpole annexation’ goes beyond a local land-use issue… I cannot support the proposal.” His comments highlight the environmental implications and potential disruption to the local landscape, which is highly valued by residents.
Adding to the controversy is billionaire landowner John Malone, who has significant land holdings in the area. Malone has expressed concern that the development would detract from the natural beauty of the region, stating, “This would really ruin it for people driving between the metros wanting to see a little of the Old West.” His foundation has committed resources to preserving the land, emphasizing the importance of conservation for future generations.
As the September 9 recall election approaches, the debate over the Buc-ee’s travel center continues to dominate discussions in Palmer Lake. Community members remain divided, weighing potential economic benefits against environmental and infrastructural concerns. The outcome of the election and the future of the proposed Buc-ee’s will significantly influence the direction of the town and its development policies.
