UPDATE: The removal hearing for San Mateo County Sheriff Christina Corpus commenced on Monday, facing serious accusations of misconduct and retaliation against critics. County attorneys are arguing that Corpus fostered a hostile work environment, while her defense claims she is a reformer targeted by a “good ol’ boys” network.
The hearing opened with a stark divide. Defense attorney Christopher Ulrich stated, “This case is not about misconduct, it is about change in culture, power, and money.” He highlighted a 400-page report by retired Judge LaDoris Cordell, which alleged secrecy, retaliation, and abuse of power, ultimately recommending her resignation. This report led the Board of Supervisors to pursue measures allowing her potential ousting by a four-fifths vote.
Retired Judge James Emerson is overseeing the hearing, expected to last two weeks. If removed, Corpus would make history as the first elected sheriff in California ousted by a county board.
Countering the defense’s narrative, county attorney Jan Little emphasized that the allegations focus on leadership failures rather than budgetary issues. “This case is not about budget challenges or red herrings,” she stated, accusing Corpus of neglecting duties and obstructing investigations.
The conflict’s root appears to stem from Corpus’ decision to end double overtime pay after nine hours—a practice attributed to County Executive Mike Callagy and the Deputy Sheriffs’ Association, which reportedly inflated costs by nearly $19 million annually. The union dismissed the defense claims, stating, “The allegations are about her being racist, homophobic, and abusive. This has nothing to do with money.”
Sitting quietly in a courtroom in a green blazer, Corpus’ team included notable figures like former U.S. Labor Secretary Tom Perez, who joined her defense last week. The first day featured testimonies from former Undersheriff Chris Hsiung and retired sheriff’s official Jeffrey Kearnan, both of whom raised concerns about Corpus’ management style and alleged inappropriate relationships within the department.
Hsiung revealed a 45-minute phone call with Callagy after his departure from the department, hinting at potential interim sheriff discussions. Meanwhile, Kearnan testified about confronting Corpus regarding an alleged relationship with Victor Aenlle, a supervisory hire who became embroiled in controversy due to his high salary and connection to the sheriff.
Witness Heather Enders, human resources manager, recounted how Corpus requested a position for Aenlle, initially at a rate of $119 per hour, which was later adjusted. The position ultimately became full-time, offering a salary of up to $246,000 annually.
Despite the informal nature of the hearings, Judge Emerson is adhering to typical court procedures, allowing both sides up to five days for evidence presentation. Following the hearings, Emerson will have 45 days to issue a recommendation to the Board of Supervisors, who will then have 30 days to vote on Corpus’ potential removal.
If the Board votes to oust her, it would take effect immediately, with a public meeting possibly scheduled for November or December. Under county rules, the Board would then have 30 days to appoint a new sheriff or call for a special election to fill the vacancy.
County spokesperson Effie Milionis Verducci stated, “The county welcomes the commencement of this hearing,” emphasizing the opportunity for both sides to present compelling evidence.
As the hearing unfolds, the implications for San Mateo County law enforcement and the broader community remain significant. The focus on leadership, accountability, and the future of the sheriff’s office keeps the public engaged as developments continue to emerge.
